Cyflwynwyd yr ymateb hwn
i’r ymgynghoriad ar y
Bil Bwyd (Cymru) Drafft
This response was submitted to
the consultation on the
Draft Food (Wales) Bill
OSFB010
Ymateb gan: | Response from: Bwrdd Iechyd
Prifysgol Aneurin Bevan | Aneurin Bevan University Health
Board
Overarching principles
Question 1: Do you agree with the overarching principles that
the Bill seeks to achieve?
Yes
There is a direct correlation between the
overarching principles of this Bill, and themes identified in a
review of the patient dining service within the Health Board. Our
internal review, which is nearing completion, has identified key
priorities which supports this Bill:
•
Procuring sustainable local produce
•
Reducing food production and service waste
•
To consider a single point of food production within the Health
Board with the potential to supply other public sector
organisations within the Health Board’s geographical area
Supply chain issues are becoming increasingly
problematic and it is hoped that this Bill would support us in
addressing them.
As prices for food provisions continue to
increase there should be consideration given to ensuring that
controls are in place to mitigate further increases that could be
experienced from a reduced procurement market
Question 2: Do you think there is a need for this legislation?
Can you provide reasons for your answer.
Yes
There is most definitely a need for this
legislation, particularly in terms of monitoring of food systems in
Wales, and removing organisational silos to drive consistent food
policies.
Food Goals
Question 3: Please provide your views on the inclusion of the
Food Goals within the Bill as the means to underpin the policy
objectives.
The inclusion of Food Goals helps provide a
clear vision for delivery of the policies objectives. Though
descriptive, the Goals could be enhanced with the inclusion of
‘quality’, whether that be as a primary or secondary
goal.
Question 4: Do you agree with the inclusion of a Primary Food
Goal supplemented by Secondary Food Goals?
Yes
Question 5: Are there additional / different areas you think
should be included in the Food Goals?
Yes. As documented in the response to Q3 there
should be a focus on quality.
Question 6: Do you have any additional comments on the Food
Goals, including the resource implications of the proposals and how
these could be minimised?
The main area of required assurance,
particularly for an organisation the size of Aneurin Bevan, would
the inclusion of clear safeguards to protect against further
increases to food provision costs, particularly relating the
narrowing of the market it would have to procure from. Further to
the financial concerns, a sufficient and sustainable supply of
high-quality ingredients would be essential the success of this
Bill.
There would be an initial resource challenge
to implement the actions within the Bill, and an on-going resource
to ensure that the Health Board dedicated sufficient time to
monitor its performance against the requirements set out in the
Bill.
Question 7: Please provide your views on the inclusion of
targets within the Bill as the means to measure how the Food Goals
are being advanced.
The setting of targets within the Bill is both
welcomed and necessary for the reasons listed within the
consultation document. It is noted that this Bill will see a
‘Welsh Food Commission’ established. Aneurin Bevan
University Health Board would encourage an All Wales NHS group to
be set up, or for this Bill to form part of an existing All Wales
agenda. This is important to ensure that the Bill is considered in
conjunction with existing National Standards such as the Nutrition
& Hydration Standards and relevant Health & Care Standards,
balancing against cost, quality and sustainability.
Question 8: Do you agree with the process for setting the
targets?
Yes, but engagement with Health Boards in
setting the targets is encouraged.
Question 9: Do you think the reporting mechanisms set out in
the draft Bill provide sufficient accountability and scope for
scrutiny?
Yes
Question 10: Do you have any additional comments on the
targets, including the resource implications of the proposals and
how these could be minimised?
Nothing that has not already been covered in
earlier responses.
Wales Food Commission
Question 11: What are your views on the need for a Welsh Food
Commission?
Agree with the need. Would like to see a
member presenting NHS Wales
Question 12: Do you agree with the goals and functions of the
Welsh Food Commission? If not, what changes would you suggest?
Yes
Question 13: Do you agree with the size of the membership of
the Food Commission and the process for appointing its
members?
Without knowing the range of representatives,
it is difficult to assess whether the size is correct or not. As
mentioned, a NHS Wales representative would be welcomed.
Question 14: What are your views on the proposal that the chair
and members can serve a maximum term of five years and that an
individual may be re-appointed as a chair or member only once? Do
you believe this is appropriate?
Yes
Question 15: Do you have any additional comments on the Food
Commission, including the resource implications of the proposals
and how these could be minimised?
No
National Food Strategy
Question 16: Do you agree that there is a need for a national
food strategy?
Yes
Question 17: Do you believe the Welsh Government’s
current strategies relating to ‘food’ are sufficiently
joined up / coherent?
It is difficult to answer without being cited
on the other documents
Question 18: Does the draft Bill do enough to ensure that Welsh
Ministers take advice and consult on the strategy before it is
made. If no, what additional mechanisms would you put in
place?
Yes, on the proviso that either (or both) the
Welsh Food Commission has a representative for NHS Wales or/and an
NHS Wales sub-group is established
Question 19: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reporting on the national food strategy are sufficient?
If not, what changes would you like to see?
Yes
Question 20: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reviewing of the national food strategy are sufficient?
If not, what changes would you like to see?
Yes
Question 21: Do you have any additional comments on the
National Food Strategy, including the resource implications of the
proposals and how these could be minimised?
No
Local Food Plans
Question 22: Do you agree that there is a need for local food
plans?
Yes
Question 23: Does the draft Bill do enough to ensure that
public bodies consult on their local food plans before they are
made. If no, what additional mechanisms would you put in
place?
Yes
Question 24: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reporting on the local food plans are sufficient? If
not, what changes would you like to see?
Yes
Question 25: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reviewing of the local food plans are sufficient? If
not, what changes would you like to see?
Yes
Question 26: Do you have any additional comments on local food
plans, including the resource implications of the proposals and how
these could be minimised?
No
General Provisions
Question 27: Do you agree with the list of persons defined as
being a ‘public body’ for the purpose of this
Bill?
Yes
Question 28: Do you have any views on the process for making
regulations set out in the Bill?
No
Question 29: Do you have any views on the proposed commencement
date for the Act?
No
General Views
Please provide any additional information relevant to the draft
Bill.
On behalf of the Aneurin Bevan University
Health Board I would welcome the introduction of this Bill,
especially with some of the comments I have offered being
considered.
As a Health Board we recognise the close links
between this Bill and a review into patient dining currently taking
place. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss further and
perhaps be considered as an early adopter of the targets set out in
the Bill.